|
Post by SenatorGregory on Feb 10, 2005 0:14:22 GMT -5
Yo this is Greg here, i want everyone to know that it is true, there IS another inquisito campain in the works, and i am officially imancipating this part of the site and strictly this forum topic to inquisitor! HAHAHAHA! anyhow, what is some stuff you all would like to see more/less of in inquisitor? what are the coolest races/models/archtypes?
Just what ever you guys want! run with it!
|
|
|
Post by Rev. Ben Blythe on Feb 10, 2005 15:16:59 GMT -5
Your last one was really good, basic cut and dry. As I have said I want to see an Eldar character, but last game the the teams were really balanced and you did a great job!
|
|
|
Post by Samwise on Feb 10, 2005 18:57:19 GMT -5
I'm sure i've said this once to you but oh well...
There needs to be more NPC's or obsticles or side quests or the like to give the game a little spice. Other than that the last one was great.
Just remember everyone If you sign up, show up for the game ALL RIGHT PAUL!!!
|
|
|
Post by Warrior Ryka on Feb 10, 2005 23:21:34 GMT -5
Eldar characters are cool and all but they are like Space Marines and Officio Assassins who are incredibly stronger than everyone else. Yet I guess if you played a lower ranking Eldar Character like just a Ranger instead of Pathfinder than that would be cool. You would have iniative by the buttload though.
|
|
|
Post by Rev. Ben Blythe on Feb 11, 2005 14:41:36 GMT -5
I think he is pretty balanced, the ranger is. Greg and I were bored with a bunch of other people, couldn't think of anything to do so we made up some bogus scenario. I whined and begged Greg enough to let me use an Eldar ranger so he let me and just told me that this would be a playtest Eldar that one time. He has a BS that is "super human" and was 119. But his toughness sucked and surprisingly, I had weak initiative and speed.
|
|
|
Post by Warrior Ryka on Feb 11, 2005 19:12:56 GMT -5
The ranger would probally be balanced but pathfinders seem a little too overpowered.
|
|
|
Post by SenatorGregory on Feb 13, 2005 1:25:21 GMT -5
yeah sam i agree totally, i would love to see more npcs, its just been hard considering the models are so expensive, i was considering for this campaign we use 40k scale, that way everyone could model their own char and it would be WYSIWYG and the tables would be bigger, and we could like buy a box of cadians and use them as PDF forces etc. or have the pc's normal size and all the npcs smaller, that way there would be no mistakes as to whos who npc wise and it would overplay the pcs and down play the npcs
also i would love it if people when they made their characters that they would make a history for them that resonably fits the campaign and gives them an alternate agenda. Then when we finished the campaign, there could be prizes for winning teams and winning charcter.
Ben, in regards to your "eldar" yes your toughness was below inquisitor and were you speed three in that game? yeah that was awesome, but i still dont know about ranger, i mean in most of our games the "supporting charcters" such as, desperados, mutants, etc. are no where near your ranger, what if you had a ranger, that was a sniper, but had his long rifle destroyed, stolen, etc. and had to use foul primitave human/alternate xenos technology (needle rifle) until you could get your hand on a new one, that could even be your personal quest. Then it would also be a little more balanced.
Oh and one more thing, ive come up with a couple new skills/weapons/equipment/archtypes/other kool stuff which i plan to post here soon
|
|
|
Post by Samwise on Feb 13, 2005 2:19:27 GMT -5
If we did do a new Inquisitor camp. greg, could i try out that idea for the demonhost? (light side and dark side) I think with some tweaking and some imagination it could be done and pretty well i might add.
If not i would gladly play Avaric in this campaign as well because he has a cool story and everything.
|
|
|
Post by Samwise on Feb 13, 2005 2:24:47 GMT -5
Also greg, this is rediculously off subject but, "if wasn't painfully difficult to accomplish, you didn't do it right."
I can see a flaw in this suppose the task was not meant to be diffiuclt like... a pie eating contest or... dancing the holly jolly on the panama cannal... maybe... sleeping even?
|
|
|
Post by SenatorGregory on Feb 13, 2005 2:52:06 GMT -5
sam in response to your previous posts
A) i sure as heck aint gonna let you play "Averic"
B) itd be fine with me if you tried that daemon host under these three conditions 1) you have to have a history of one of its previous incarnations 2) you have to spell demon "daemon" C) and you have to come up with a GOOD name you know......a GOOD one
and Ca?) yeah shut up, a GOOD pie eating contest aintt meant to be easy
|
|
|
Post by SenatorGregory on Feb 13, 2005 23:31:47 GMT -5
oh yeah, another thing i was thinking about doing was like some sort of career tree or something. I think it would provide a kool underlying base for a character and give it mor depth.
Also, wouldnt it be kool if i created an entire planet and a reason for the two lead characters for being there and then like a mercenary pool where all the other characters were so the lead characters could pick and choose. Then they would have to do theyre own research to figure out the plot and when the two paths met weed fight a battle or something. Wouldn't that be cool?
|
|
|
Post by Warrior Ryka on Feb 13, 2005 23:34:40 GMT -5
Ya that would be pretty cool...yet you do know in you last post you used kool and cool. For that I have contacted the FBI and they will be at your doorstep by tueday.
|
|
|
Post by SenatorGregory on Feb 15, 2005 0:27:09 GMT -5
CRAP! all those bootlegged VHS's i made back in the nineties are gonna put me in hot water now!
|
|
|
Post by Rev. Ben Blythe on Feb 15, 2005 16:13:34 GMT -5
LOL Why do all these boards always seem to veer wildly off subject?
|
|
|
Post by SenatorGregory on Feb 15, 2005 18:27:48 GMT -5
Yeah! hey everybody, lets get back on track. What do you guys think of doing the entire campaign 40k scale? and if so, would you guys agree to making wysiwyg models?
|
|